Audience Feedback

Considering that only about 5 people took part in every of my polls posted on the blog, the audience's feedback is a bit limited. Firstly, about 80% of the polled people think that the title of my magazine connotes "A music magazine for "serious" music lovers", which is actually the aim I have wanted to achieve with my magazine. What is more the rest 20% is spread all over three next answers, as the magazine might have appeared differently to everyone. The second poll asked which music genres my magazine connotes. The majority answered that it was indie and rock music; however there were two individual answers for soul and pop. Rock and Indie were my priority music genres; however I’ve wanted my magazine to seem more diverse. I believe if only more people had answered the polls, I would have got some more voices for pop and soul. The third poll was about the layout and what it communicates. Here the voices spread mainly between the first and second answer, which were “A fast moving, latest news magazine” and “A magazine that is designed for female audience”. I believe that my magazine might have appeared like it is addressed to woman, because of the bright, purple colour, which I have actually used as a motif, placing it all over the magazine. There was only one voice for “The professional music magazine for ‘serious’ music lovers” and that was my main idea for the magazine, as I tried to follow the conventions of ‘Q’. The next question asked whether the price of my magazine is appropriate to its appeal, and everyone answered yes. The last question asked – “would you buy ma magazine”, the majority answered yes.